The future of hidradenitis suppurativa is here thanks to Legit.Health‘s revolutionary AIHS4 (Automatic, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System). The researchers have developed a tool that processes smartphone images and automatically analyses them using the same criteria as the IHS4.
Is widely known that objective, reliable, and precise outcome measures are key to the practice of evidence-based medicine. In the case of hidradenitis suppurativa, the IHS4 is the most modern and reliable measurement tool, widely recommended for its use in clinical trials. That’s why Legit.Health has chosen it as a base for its new and revolutionary technology.
The origins of IHS4
Before the development of the IHS4 in 2017, other systems such as the Hurley classification or the MSS ( Modified Sartorius Score) were widely used by physicians. Although these older systems lacked granularity and precision, the absence of an alternative method made them widespread in both clinical practice and trials.
However, it [Hurley’s classification] is static and was not designed as a dynamic score for accurate assessment of the extent of inflammation within each stage.C.C. Zouboulis, T. Tzellos, A. Kyrgidis et all, on behalf of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Investigator Group. Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity
The IHS4 was developed with those issues in mind, and the panel of experts that put it together focused on reaching a more objective, precise, and reliable way of measuring the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa.
The formula developed by the panel of experts added the three more common symptoms of Hidradenitis suppurativa (and multiplied them by a factor relevant to how indicative they were to the severity of the disease. This way, the number of nodules is multiplied by 1, the number of abscesses by 2, and the number of draining tunnels (fistulae/sinuses) by 4.
All of this added, made the IHS4 score.
Said score is then compared against a small reference table that assigns an interpretable meaning to each bracket of scores.
- Less than 3 points: Mild
- Between 2 and 10 points: Moderate
- More than 11 points: Severe
C.C. Zouboulis, T. Tzellos, A. Kyrgidis et all, on behalf of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Investigator Group. Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity
Limitations of the pen and paper IHS4
The main goal of the IHS4 is to provide doctors with a tool to assess the severity of the disease in a precise and consistent way for routine evaluations and clinical trials in a fast and easy-to-use manner.
A precise classification of disease severity is based on the subjective assessment of the clinical manifestation by a physician, so the doctor’s experience plays a significant role.Katarzyna Włodarek, Aleksandra Stefaniak, Łukasz Matusiak, Jacek C. Szepietowski. Could Residents Adequately Assess the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa? Interrater and intrarater Reliability Assessment of Major Scoring Systems
Despite its contributions to solving the issues of its predecessors, the IHS4 presents the same issues as many other scoring systems: a high degree of subjectivity derived from the visual nature of the test and a process reported by many doctors as too time-consuming and tedious.
Stepping over digital calculators
The case of the IHS4 is a very special one. Unlike most dermatological scoring systems for other diseases, such as PASI or SCORAD, the relatively new development of this method has allowed the medical community to skip one common yet outdated step in the advancement of the state of the art for this field.
This step, consisting of developing a computer calculator, tries to tackle one of the main issues with any scoring system: The time needed to apply it properly. They do it by turning the many calculations the doctors usually need to make into an automatic process.
This is yet to happen in the diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa, as the IHS4 is a relatively young scoring system and there has not been enough time for one of these calculators to emerge.
Instead of that, with AIHS4, we are jumping right into the future of dermatology by addressing both the issues of time and objectivity within the traditional method.
How do we know what scoring system is better?
Among the many criteria for rating the quality of outcome measures, some stand out as key to determining whether a scoring system is useful:
- Ease of use: can be applied easily, given constraints of time and money.
- Sensitivity to change: the ability to detect clinically significant changes over time.
- Interobserver reliability: different investigators provide identical results.
- Intra-observer variability: repeated measurements by the same investigator provide identical results.
- Interpretability: assigns qualitative meaning to scores (mild, severe…).
Methods and definitions to rate the quality of outcome measures. Schmitt, J., Langan, S., Deckert, S., Svensson, A., von Kobyletzki, L., Thomas, K., & Spuls, P. (2013). Assessment of clinical signs of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and recommendation. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 132(6), 1337–1347. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.008
7 ways in which AIHS4 is better
The revolutionary tool developed by Legit.Health allows next-generation dermatologists to practice evidence-based medicine while speeding up the reporting process for the pathology and increasing the patient’s autonomy and control.
This clinical data and communication app uses deep learning algorithms to relieve doctors from the tedious manual calculation of scoring systems, by automatically grading lesions by analyzing smartphone images and small patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In other words: the tool will automatically fill in most of the dermatology scoring systems, such as PASI, SCORAD, UAS, GAGS, and of course, IHS4.
The main goal of AIHS4 is to provide a tool to record data precisely and consistently for routine evaluations and clinical studies
|Pen and Paper||Digital||Automatic AI|
|Ease of use||≈ 600 seconds||≈ 420 seconds||≈ 23 seconds|
|Sensitivity to change||0 to 4||0 to 4||0 to 100|
|Interobserver variability||Medium (20%)||Medium (20%)||Lowest (8%)|
1. AIHS4 improves the rate of correct diagnosis
The algorithm created by Legit.Health isn’t limited to measuring the severity of the affection as the IHS4 does, it also has been trained using the input of top dermatologists to be able to distinguish between 232 pathologies, including most abscess-producing diseases.
This telematic follow-up prevented school absences in paediatric patients, work absences in adults, and allowed the follow-up of patients in quarantine due to COVID-19 or with diseases that make it difficult to travel. Both patients and their dermatologists showed a high degree of satisfaction with the use of the app, with 100% of patients interested in continuing to use the tool.Dr. Marta Andreu, Torrejón Hospital
Thus, AIHS4 will assist the doctor in the disease assessment process, not only by making it quicker by providing relevant information but improving the rate of correct diagnosis by 23%
2. Easier to use and faster than its analogic counterpart
One of the main advantages of the AIHS4 over the traditional methods is its speed. Where an experienced doctor might need six or seven minutes to completely fill in and calculate the IHS4, Legit.Health‘s algorithm only needs 23 seconds to get the final score.
The disease severity assessment is often confusing, especially for young, unexperienced dermatologists.Katarzyna Włodarek, Aleksandra Stefaniak, Łukasz Matusiak, Jacek C. Szepietowski. Could Residents Adequately Assess the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa? Interrater and intrarater Reliability Assessment of Major Scoring Systems
This entails an incredible advantage for its users, both from time management and clinical perspective. The sad fact is that many physicians won’t take the time to properly fill in any scoring system at all, and will rely on a gut estimate to determine the severity of the affection. This happens because traditional scoring systems are widely considered too tedious and time-consuming for a practical application on a day-to-day basis.
Thanks to AIHS4 that should no longer be a concern. This fast and easy-to-use tool puts its usability at the forefront of its design and strives to facilitate the practice of evidence-based medicine.
3. AIHS4 can detect small changes in the evolution of the pathology
Legit.Health‘s tool analyzes the pathologies using a validated scoring system that has both the lowest MID (Minimal important Difference) and is sensible to the lowest LDC (Lowest Detectable Change), which means the algorithm analyzes every image with more precision and attention to detail than any human observer would.
Furthermore, it has a higher validity and reliability while maintaining comparable clinimetric properties, thanks to the intrinsic functioning of computer vision algorithms.
Given the complexity of determining the severity of a disease like hidradenitis suppurativa, the AIHS4 provides the kind of granularity and precision needed to provide the doctor with all the information needed for a successful diagnosis.
4. Provides a significant reduction in inter-observer variability
The experimental results show that AIHS4 outperforms significantly the baseline methods when it comes to inter-observer variability, as the algorithm achieves a mean absolute percentage of error of just 8%, way lower than the usual 20% that is observed in the classical application of the IHS4.
Estimating is guessing, counting is measuringAlfonso Medela, CAIO
Additionally, the reliability of this method will only increase as time passes and the technology gets better, making it possible for the automatic assessment of severity using algorithms to become even more precise in the future.
5. AIHS4 reduces the intra-observer variability to zero
Because is based on an algorithm, AIHS4 eliminates completely the intra-observer variability, as every image and calculation is stored in the database. In other words, the app has a perfect memory of every picture saved and every diagnosis made.
Legit.Health allows the doctor to not rely on his memory when assessing the severity of the affection and focusing on the analysis of the objective data stored in the app reduces considerably the risk of misremembering, providing a more objective, accurate, and precise way of tracing the development of the disease.
This becomes especially important in clinical trials, where reducing this kind of variability is key to gathering the precise data required in this kind of study.
6. The data is more accessible and easier to read
Legit.Health‘s interface provides access to all the relevant information about the patient in an easy-to-read manner.
Every data derived from the AIHS4 is clearly displayed on the screen, showing the severity of the affection and the different factors considered by the algorithm when analyzing the image and their punctuations.
On the other hand, easy-to-lose paper trails are a thing of the past, especially when you can have all the patient’s information, test results, and pictures in a digital database that is being constantly backed up.
7. An easy way of following the progress of a treatment
As hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic disease, the post-diagnosis follow-up is crucial for the good development of the treatment.
Legit.Health improves the communication channels between doctor and patient, allowing them to become a more active part of their treatment. The app achieves this by giving the user an easy and reliable way of sending accurate data to the doctor.
Additionally, the app displays the data in an easy-to-read graph showing the progress of the affection, making answering the usually difficult question “Am I getting better, Doctor?” a piece of cake.
Enhancing Evidence-Based Medicine
In the practice of evidence-based medicine, objective, reliable, and precise outcome measures are crucial. Traditionally, HS severity assessment has been subjective, relying on clinical judgment alone. However, the AIHS4 developed by Legit.Health introduces a transformative shift by providing an automated and standardized approach to HS severity scoring. By utilizing the same criteria as the IHS4, which is highly regarded and recommended for use in clinical trials, Legit.Health ensures that practitioners have access to a modern and reliable measurement tool. This advancement empowers healthcare professionals to make informed decisions, track disease progression accurately, and evaluate treatment efficacy with greater confidence.
Implementation of Value-Based Healthcare
Value-based healthcare aims to optimize patient outcomes while maximizing the value of healthcare resources. By offering an automated HS severity scoring system, Legit.Health supports the implementation of value-based healthcare in the management of HS. Here’s how:
- Standardization and Consistency: The AIHS4 ensures standardized and consistent assessment across various healthcare settings. By removing subjective variability, practitioners can establish a unified language for HS severity, facilitating effective communication, and improving treatment planning.
- Efficiency and Time Savings: The automated analysis of smartphone images significantly reduces the time and effort required for HS severity assessment. This streamlined process allows practitioners to focus on delivering timely interventions, enhancing patient care, and optimizing resource allocation.
- Enhanced Patient-Centered Care: By providing accurate and objective HS severity scores, Legit.Health’s AIHS4 contributes to patient-centered care. Clear documentation of disease progression helps clinicians involve patients in shared decision-making, tailor treatment plans, and set realistic goals, ultimately improving patient satisfaction and outcomes.
- Real-World Data and Research: The AIHS4 tool generates a wealth of standardized data that can be used for research and clinical studies. This data repository enables further understanding of HS, identification of novel treatment approaches, and evaluation of interventions, fostering continuous improvement and innovation in HS management.
Legit.Health’s Automatic, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (AIHS4) represents a major breakthrough in the field of HS. By harnessing the power of AI and adhering to the established IHS4 criteria, this innovative technology provides practitioners with a reliable, efficient, and objective method for assessing HS severity. The implementation of AIHS4 not only enhances evidence-based medicine but also enables the implementation of value-based healthcare, benefiting both healthcare providers and HS patients alike. With Legit.Health’s pioneering contribution, the future of HS care looks brighter than ever before.
Is not hard to see how a technology that helps doctors to better manage their time and to collect data more reliably and consistently is the future of the medical field.
Thanks to Legit.Health, doctors across the globe can improve their correct diagnosis rate by 23% and make treatment easier to follow for the patient by turning them into active participants in their own recovery while enabling the doctor to practice evidence-based medicine.
We cannot improve what we cannot measure, and thanks to AIHS4 and Legit.Health the future of the study and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa is brighter than ever.
Get access now
This free 23-day trial of Legit.Health gives clinics and hospitals a hands-on look at how to drive increased adherence and improve patient outcomes, as well as improving efficiency and overall quality of life.
We are here to help
What can you expect from contacting us?
- Demo of the platform: See the inside of the application first-hand
- Understand the solution: find the right features for you
- Pricing: discover the plan that suits you best
- Connect with helpful resources