Saltar al contenido principal

Scoring Methodology

The platform from Legit.Health scores alopecia by measuring hair loss rather than estimating it: the software segments every pixel of four scalp photographs, measures the percentage of hair loss in each quadrant and combines the four into the SALT score, and the investigator reviews the report at the visit. The per-quadrant percentages are reported in their own right, so any responder definition the protocol needs comes from the same capture.

The example images on this page are synthetic dermatology imagery used for illustration; they are not patient records.

Hair loss segmentation​

  1. Photograph: Four scalp quadrants.
  2. Segment: Hair, no hair or non-scalp per pixel.
  3. Measure: Hair loss % per quadrant.
  4. Weight: Each quadrant's share of the scalp.
  5. Score: Total SALT, 0 to 100.

A deep learning segmentation model, trained on scalp images annotated by several annotators and unified into a consensus reference, assigns every pixel of each photograph to one of three classes.

Hair

Scalp with visible hair coverage.

What the AI looks for: Hair strands and their texture over the scalp

No hair

Scalp exhibiting hair loss: patches, thinning to bare skin, or complete loss.

What the AI looks for: Exposed scalp skin inside the scalp boundary

Non-scalp

Background, face, ears, neck and clothing. Excluded from the calculation.

What the AI looks for: Everything outside the scalp boundary

From photograph to percentage​

Photograph of the back of the scalp with patches of alopecia
1. Original photograph
One scalp quadrant, captured at the visit
The same photograph with hair segmented in violet and hair loss in pink
2. Segmentation
Hair in violet, hair loss in pink
69%Hair lossMeasured at pixel level on the quadrant photograph
3. Hair loss percentage
No-hair pixels as a share of the visible scalp
HairNo hair

For each quadrant rr, the hair loss percentage is the share of no-hair pixels within the visible scalp:

Sr=no-hair pixelshair pixels+no-hair pixels×100S_r = \frac{\text{no-hair pixels}}{\text{hair pixels} + \text{no-hair pixels}} \times 100

Non-scalp pixels are left out of both terms, so the background, the face and the ears never count as hair loss. Each pixel is assigned its most probable class, with no tunable threshold, so the same photograph always gives the same percentage.

SALT​

The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) was defined in the alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines of the National Alopecia Areata Foundation (Olsen et al., 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology). It is the standard measure of the extent of scalp hair loss in alopecia areata trials.

SALT divides the scalp into four quadrants and weights each by its share of the total scalp area:

Top of the scalp

Top40%

Vertex and crown, the largest region of the scalp

Back of the scalp

Back24%

Posterior scalp, from the occiput to the nape

Left side of the scalp

Left side18%

Left lateral scalp, above and around the ear

Right side of the scalp

Right side18%

Right lateral scalp, above and around the ear

The total score is the weighted sum of the four quadrant percentages:

SALT=0.40×Stop+0.24×Sback+0.18×Sleft+0.18×Sright\text{SALT} = 0.40 \times S_{\text{top}} + 0.24 \times S_{\text{back}} + 0.18 \times S_{\text{left}} + 0.18 \times S_{\text{right}}

where each SS is the hair loss percentage of that quadrant. The score runs from 0, no hair loss, to 100, complete loss of scalp hair. Because of the weights, the same loss counts more on the top of the scalp: 50% hair loss on the top adds 20 points, while 50% on one side adds 9.

Top
Back
Left side
Right side
40%
24%
18%
18%

SALT quadrant weights. Together the four quadrants make up the whole scalp.

Severity bands​

SALT itself is a continuous score. The original SALT guidelines group it into ordinal grades from S0 to S5 without descriptive labels, and there is no single agreed classification of alopecia areata severity (King et al., 2022). The platform uses the categories of the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA), which gives each range of the total SALT score a clinical label (Wyrwich et al., 2020). Its upper limit for limited hair loss, SALT 20, is the same threshold used to define treatment success. A protocol can set different cut-offs during study design, for example for severity-based inclusion criteria.

Limited
Moderate
Severe
Very severe
0
1 to 20
21 to 49
50 to 94
95 to 100

AA-IGA severity categories of the total SALT score. A score of 0 means no hair loss.

SALT response thresholds​

SALT scores one visit. Response to treatment is read from the same score, either as an absolute threshold or against the patient's baseline visit. A patient achieves a response at a visit when its condition below is true:

  • SALT 20 or less: 20% scalp hair loss or less at the visit. An absolute threshold: it does not need the baseline.
  • SALT 50: The SALT score at the visit is at least 50% lower than at baseline.
  • SALT 75: The SALT score at the visit is at least 75% lower than at baseline.
  • SALT 90: The SALT score at the visit is at least 90% lower than at baseline.

Clinicians and patients regard reaching 20% scalp hair loss or less as treatment success for patients with extensive hair loss (Wyrwich et al., 2020). Because every visit is scored on the same continuous scale, these definitions are derived directly from the per-visit scores, with no re-scoring.

A worked example​

An illustrative example, not study data: the same patient followed across a 36-week trial, with an assessment every 12 weeks. The per-quadrant percentages are measured on the four photographs of each visit; the SALT score combines them, and the thresholds show when the patient reaches each response.

SALT by visit

Against the SALT 50 and SALT 20 thresholds

0255075100SALT 50 (33.7)SALT 20 (20)BaselineWk 12Wk 24Wk 36Baseline: 67.367.3Week 12: 49.749.7Week 24: 2626Week 36: 1212

SALT contribution by quadrant

Points each quadrant adds to the total

BaselineSALT 67.3
Week 12SALT 49.7
Week 24SALT 26
Week 36SALT 12
TopBackLeft sideRight side
Hair loss per quadrantBaselineWeek 12Week 24Week 36
Top (40%)90%70%35%15%
Back (24%)60%40%20%10%
Left side (18%)29%22%15%10%
Right side (18%)65%45%25%10%
SALT67.349.7 (−26%)26 (−61%)12 (−82%)
SALT 20 or lessReferenceNot yetNot yetAchieved
SALT 50ReferenceNot yetAchievedAchieved
SALT 75ReferenceNot yetNot yetAchieved
SALT 90ReferenceNot yetNot yetNot yet

The patient reaches SALT 50 at week 24, and SALT 75 and SALT 20 or less at week 36, while SALT 90 is not yet reached. The top of the scalp drives most of the change: it weighs 40%, so its regrowth from 90% to 15% hair loss removes 30 of the 55 points the score falls. The photographs below show the left side of the same scalp at the first and last visits.

Left side of the scalp at baseline
‹›
SegmentationPhotograph
Baseline
Left side, 29% hair loss
Left side of the scalp at week 36
‹›
SegmentationPhotograph
Week 36
Left side, 10% hair loss

Drag the slider to compare the segmentation with the original photograph.

Manual vs. automated scoring​

Manual scoringAutomated scoring
SALT estimated by a clinicianPixel-level segmentation of four photographs
Hair loss per quadrantEstimated by eyeMeasured from the pixels of each photograph
ResolutionCoarse steps, often roundedContinuous percentage
ReproducibilityDepends on the rater and varies across sitesSame score for the same image, every time
TrainingCalibration exercises to align ratersFollowing the capture protocol instead of calibrating estimates
Time per assessmentFour quadrants examined and estimated at every visitSeconds of AI analysis, plus capture of four photographs

The model version is locked at study initiation, so every patient is scored by the same model from first visit to last; see model version locking. The validation of the model is on Clinical evidence.

Image-based scoring

The AI reads hair loss from what the photograph shows. Shadows, partings and very light hair on a pale scalp can look like hair loss, and the model measures the extent of hair loss without identifying its cause; see Limitations.