Ir para o conteúdo principal

Sample Outputs and Deliverables

This page shows the concrete outputs a sponsor, CRO or investigator receives from a cutaneous lupus erythematosus assessment. The AI generates a structured report within seconds of image submission, with no central reader and no manual scoring.

The images on this page are synthetic dermatology imagery generated for illustration, not patient records. The scores beside them are the actual values the medical device returned for those images. Because CLASI is not yet validated in a CLE population, they demonstrate what the report looks like and what the device measures, not how accurately it scores CLASI. See Limitations.

Per-visit assessment report

Each image submission produces a standardised CLASI report within seconds of upload, with per-region signs and the assembled Activity and Damage scores:

CLASI Activity

CLASI-A 11

Reversible activity, range 0–70

CLASI Damage

CLASI-D 6

Cumulative damage, range 0–56

p]:mb-0>

Timestamp

9/12/2026, 7:28:01 PM

p]:mb-0>

Analysis performed in

1.6 seconds

AI segmentation: Nose and malar area

Region

Nose and malar area

Image quality (DIQA)

83%

Erythema2
Scale / hypertrophy1
Dyspigmentation1
Depigmentation index5.4

Local CLASI-A (E + S)

3

AI segmentation: Rest of face

Region

Rest of face

Image quality (DIQA)

91%

Erythema3
Scale / hypertrophy1
Dyspigmentation0
Depigmentation index0.0

Local CLASI-A (E + S)

4

AI segmentation: Scalp

Region

Scalp

Image quality (DIQA)

81%

Erythema1
Scale / hypertrophy0
Dyspigmentation1
Depigmentation index3.1

Local CLASI-A (E + S)

1

CLASI-A = regional (E + S) 8 + clinician-entered items 3 = 11 (Moderate)

Example CLASI report. Synthetic imagery, real device outputs for the signs shown.

What the report contains

OutputDetail
Erythema intensityGraded severity of redness, the dominant CLASI-A activity sign
Scale and indurationDesquamation and plaque thickening, resolving the CLASI-A scale item
Depigmentation extentContinuous measure of the depigmented area, feeding CLASI-D dyspigmentation
Hair loss percentageProportion of the scalp affected, for scalp regions
Assembled CLASI-A / CLASI-DActivity and damage scores, from the per-region signs plus clinician-entered items
Segmentation overlaysEach sign's mask on the original photograph, for visual verification
Image quality (DIQA)Quality score per capture; sub-threshold images flagged for recapture
TimestampUTC timestamp of capture and processing

Three CLASI components are not read from the image (mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and dyspigmentation duration). The investigator completes these at review and the platform assembles the full CLASI-A and CLASI-D. See Scoring methodology.

The repigmentation signal

This is the output CLASI cannot produce on its own. CLASI-D records dyspigmentation as a single present-or-absent item, so a lesion that is refilling with pigment holds the same damage score visit after visit. Because the device measures depigmentation as a continuous extent, the same pair of visits shows a clear, quantified improvement.

Baseline: depigmentation mask covering the whole pale centre of the plaque

Baseline: depigmentation index 5.4, active erythema present

Follow-up: the same lesion with the depigmentation mask shrunk to the remaining pale area

Follow-up: depigmentation index 2.7, erythema resolved

−50%

The continuous depigmentation measure roughly halves between the two visits and the mask visibly follows the repigmenting border. Over the same interval the binary CLASI-D dyspigmentation item does not move, because pigmentation is still abnormal. The improvement is real and the instrument alone cannot express it.

Longitudinal tracking

From the first follow-up visit onward the platform charts severity evolution for each patient:

  • CLASI-A trajectory: absolute and percentage change from baseline, the usual basis for an activity response endpoint
  • CLASI-D trajectory: accumulation across the study, which should stay flat under an effective therapy
  • Target lesion trajectory: per-lesion area and per-sign values for each designated lesion
  • Repigmentation: reduction in depigmented area from baseline, per lesion and per region
  • Per-region and per-sign trends: which regions are responding and which sign is driving a change
Severity chart

Data export for EDC integration

Every assessment is structured for export to the sponsor's EDC. Per-sign values are exported alongside the assembled scores, so early-phase studies can analyse the continuous measures directly rather than only the CLASI items they feed.

FieldDescriptionFormat
Patient identifierStudy-specific pseudonymised IDString
Visit and timestampVisit number and UTC timestamp of capture and processingISO 8601
Anatomical regionWhich of the 13 CLASI regions the image coversEnum
Target lesion IDStable identifier for a designated target lesion, where usedString
Erythema intensityPer region, on the mapped CLASI item scaleInteger
Scale and indurationDesquamation and induration intensity per regionInteger
Depigmentation extentAffected area, relative or absolute (mm² with marker capture)Float
Hair loss percentageProportion of the scalp region affectedFloat
CLASI-A / CLASI-DAssembled activity and damage scores per visitInteger
Change from baselineAbsolute and percentage, per score and per target lesionFloat
DIQA scoreImage quality per capture; sub-threshold images flaggedFloat
Segmentation overlaysAnnotated images and per-sign masksPNG / JPEG

Data transfers automatically via RESTful API, scheduled S3 export, or CSV/Excel. Legit.Health provides IQ/OQ documentation and data-mapping specifications for the major EDC platforms (Medidata Rave, Oracle InForm, Veeva Vault EDC).

AI visual outputs

Every report carries the segmentation overlays behind its numbers, so an investigator can verify each measurement against the photograph rather than take the score on trust. This matters most where a measurement can be right for the wrong reason, and it is the check the Limitations page recommends making part of any extent endpoint.

Active disease segmentation

The erythema, scale and induration models mark the inflamed plaque and its adherent scale.

Discoid lupus plaque, original photograph

Input: single-region photograph

Same plaque with the active-disease segmentation overlaid

Output: active plaque segmented

Depigmentation segmentation

The depigmentation model marks only the pigment-loss area, excluding the surrounding hyperpigmented border, which is what makes the continuous repigmentation measure above possible.

Discoid lupus plaque, original photograph

Input: single-region photograph

Same plaque with the depigmentation mask confined to the pale central area

Output: depigmented area segmented

Scalp hair loss

On the scalp, the hair-loss model measures the affected proportion, feeding both the CLASI-A alopecia item and the CLASI-D scalp item.

Scalp with scarring alopecia patches from discoid lupus

Input: scalp photograph

Same scalp with the hair-loss segmentation overlaid on the affected patches

Output: hair loss segmented by area

Performance across skin phototypes

The signs behave differently across phototypes, and honestly so. Erythema is a high-contrast target on light skin and harder on dark; depigmentation is the reverse. The subacute example below is a light-phototype face where the erythema segmentation performs well.

Subacute cutaneous lupus, annular plaques on a light-phototype cheek

Input: subacute CLE, light phototype

Same face with the erythema segmentation overlaid on the annular plaques

Output: annular plaques segmented

The direction of that trade-off, and how to design around it, is set out on the Limitations page.

Reproducibility and validation status

The AI returns the identical value for the identical image, at every site, with no calibration drift and no inter-rater variability. That is the property that makes a multi-year CLASI-D trajectory comparable with its own baseline.

The measurements themselves are verified and validated as part of the CE-marked device, with cutaneous lupus inside its registered intended use. What an additional CLE-specific study would add is the agreement between the assembled CLASI and expert CLASI scoring in a CLE cohort; no such CLE-specific reliability statistic is quoted here until it is measured. The natural first step is a retrospective study against an existing CLE image set that already carries per-visit CLASI-A and CLASI-D scores, set out in full on the Clinical evidence page.

Further reading