Saltar al contenido principal

8 publicaciones etiquetados con "Severity"

Ver Todas las Etiquetas

Desarrollo y evaluación de una herramienta basada en inteligencia artificial para puntuar la gravedad de las lesiones en imágenes clínicas de psoriasis pustulosa generalizada

· 8 min de lectura
JID Innovations
JID Innovations
Peer-reviewed open access journal of the Society for Investigative Dermatology
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Pharmaceutical company

Publicado en JID Innovations, este estudio revisado por pares presenta el Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment automático (AGPPGA), una herramienta basada en inteligencia artificial que puntúa la pustulación, el eritema y la descamación a partir de imágenes clínicas de psoriasis pustulosa generalizada (PPG), una enfermedad rara y potencialmente mortal cuya gravedad es difícil de evaluar de forma homogénea.

Sabater A, Medela A, Hernández Montilla I, Aguilar Robles SA, Mac Carthy T, Mollet Sanchez J, Baniandrés O, Izu-Belloso R, Mataix Díaz J, Rueda JM, Sanz-Motilva V, Chowdhry GSS, Semeco J, Martorell A. Development and assessment of an artificial intelligence–based tool for scoring lesion severity in generalized pustular psoriasis clinical images. JID Innovations. 2026;6:100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100521

Resumen​

  • Tipo de estudio: Desarrollo y validación retrospectiva de una herramienta de puntuación de gravedad basada en IA
  • Revista: JID Innovations (2026)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100521
  • Conjuntos de datos: 2 conjuntos de imágenes de PPG, V1 (332 imágenes) y V2 (4296 imágenes de 46 pacientes), con diversidad de sexos, edades y tonos de piel
  • Estándar de referencia: consenso de 2 paneles de dermatólogos con certificación europea y experiencia en psoriasis y PPG (3 anotadores para V1 y 4 para V2)
  • Objetivo: Evaluar automáticamente los 3 signos visuales del GPPGA (pústulas, eritema y descamación) y comparar la concordancia de la herramienta con el consenso de expertos frente a la de los propios dermatólogos

ALADIN (Acne Lesion And Density INdex): a novel tool for automatic acne severity assessment

· 3 min de lectura
Oxford Academic
Oxford Academic
Academic publishing platform of Oxford University Press
British Association of Dermatologists
British Association of Dermatologists
Professional dermatology association

Published in Skin Health and Disease (Oxford Academic), this peer-reviewed study introduces ALADIN (Acne Lesion And Density INdex), an artificial intelligence-driven tool that combines inflammatory lesion count and spatial density from facial images to produce reproducible, interpretable acne severity scores aligned with the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale.

Medela A, Sabater A, Hernández Montilla I, Mac Carthy T, Aguilar A, Fernández G, Martorell A, Vera Carretero S, Balboni C, Martín Alcalde J, Ramírez Bellver JL, Martin-Gorgojo A, Rodriguez Jiménez P, López Estebaranz JL. ALADIN (Acne Lesion And Density INdex): a novel tool for automatic acne severity assessment. Skin Health and Disease. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/skinhd/vzag062

Overcoming measurement challenges in clinical practice: a deep learning-based approach to monocular surface area measurement

· 2 min de lectura
Oxford Academic
Oxford Academic
Academic publishing platform of Oxford University Press
British Association of Dermatologists
British Association of Dermatologists
Professional dermatology association

Published in Skin Health and Disease (Oxford Academic), this peer-reviewed study introduces a deep learning framework that accurately measures skin lesion surface areas from standard smartphone images — a critical step for objective severity scoring in conditions assessed with tools such as PASI and SCORAD.

Medela A, Sabater A, Fernández G, Mac Carthy T, Aguilar A, Herrera D, Falqués M, Martorell A. Overcoming measurement challenges in clinical practice: a deep learning-based approach to monocular surface area measurement. Skin Health and Disease. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/skinhd/vzag064

Artificial Intelligence-Based Quantification to Assess the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (APASI)

· 2 min de lectura
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Peer-reviewed journal

The APASI, our innovative system for automated psoriasis severity assessment, is detailed in JEADV Clinical Practice. This study demonstrates our advancement in creating AI-powered solutions for precise dermatological evaluations.

Mac Carthy T, Dagnino D, Medela A, Fernández G, Aguilar A, Martorell A, Gómez-Tejerina P, Roustán-Gullón G. Artificial Intelligence-Based Quantification to Assess the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. JEADV Clin Pract. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.70143

Automatic Urticaria Activity Score (AUAS): Deep Learning-based Automatic Hive Counting for Urticaria Severity Assessment

· Lectura de un minuto
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Peer-reviewed journal

The Automatic Urticaria Activity Score (AUAS) system has been published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (JID) Innovations, showcasing our deep learning-based approach for urticaria severity assessment.

Mac Carthy, T., Hernández Montilla, I., Aguilar, A., García Castro, R., González Pérez, A. M., Vilas Sueiro, A., Vergara de la Campa, L., Alfageme, F., & Medela, A. (2024). Automatic Urticaria Activity Score: Deep Learning-Based Automatic Hive Counting for Urticaria Severity Assessment. In JID Innovations (Vol. 4, Issue 1, p. 100218). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2023.100218

Automatic International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (AIHS4): A novel tool to assess the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa using artificial intelligence

· 2 min de lectura
Skin Research and Technology
Skin Research and Technology
Peer-reviewed journal

The AIHS4, our novel system for scoring Hidradenitis Suppurativa, is detailed in Skin Research and Technology. This study exemplifies our commitment to developing practical AI solutions for complex dermatological conditions.

Hernández Montilla, I., Medela, A., Mac Carthy, T., Aguilar, A., Gómez Tejerina, P., Vilas Sueiro, A., González Pérez, A. M., Vergara de la Campa, L., Luna Bastante, L., García Castro, R., & Alfageme Roldán, F. (2023). Automatic International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (AIHS4): A novel tool to assess the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa using artificial intelligence. In Skin Research and Technology (Vol. 29, Issue 6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13357

Clinical validation of AI for continuous and remote monitoring of the severity of the patient's condition

· 5 min de lectura
Ribera Salud Group
Ribera Salud Group
Public and private healthcare provider
Elena Sánchez-Largo
Elena Sánchez-Largo
Dermatologist

Conclusions​

The study conducted to evaluate the clinical performance, efficacy, and safety of the device has yielded promising results. The comprehensive analysis of the CUS, Data Utility questionnaire, SUS, and Patient Satisfaction questionnaire has provided valuable insights into the tool's effectiveness in supporting dermatologists in their clinical practice.

The observed sample mean of 76.67 on the CUS suggests that the device has been positively received by the participating specialists. Noteworthy is the unanimous agreement on the ease of use and the high rating for optimizing time according to each patient's needs. It's also worth noting that, despite that the medical device was positively rated by the specialists, the goal of achieving a mean of 80.00 on the CUS was not reached. This result was due to the lower sample size of specialists who completed the questionnaire. In this way, an outlier, and due to the small sample size, impacted disproportionately the overall result, especially for questions 7, 8, 9 and 11. As can be seen by the higher standard deviation and lower mean average in these specific questions. We need to take this fact into account for the following studies and implement measures to mitigate this effect, such as a larger sample size, which could have diluted the effect of the outliers over the statistical outcomes, or predefined management for outliers.

Additionally, the device demonstrated efficiency in generating reports, receiving high ratings from the specialists. These outcomes affirm the device's potential to streamline clinical workflows and enhance patient care.

The Data Utility questionnaire revealed unanimous agreement among specialists regarding the usefulness of a device to facilitate their regular practice. Moreover, the majority expressed a preference for utilizing a device to identify the severity of cases, indicating its potential as an aid in diagnostic support.

The System Usability Scale assessment further underlines the positive reception of the device. Specialists found the tool to be user-friendly, with high scores indicating ease of navigation and minimal complexity. The unanimous agreement on the ease of use and the absence of perceived expertise required to navigate the device emphasize its accessibility and suitability for clinicians.

Patient satisfaction is a crucial aspect of any medical tool or platform. The results of the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire indicate a generally positive response from patients. They found the device to be easy to use, useful in monitoring their condition, and were satisfied with the care provided through the device.

In conclusion, the device has demonstrated notable clinical utility, usability, and safety in the evaluation of dermatological pathologies. The positive responses from both specialists and patients affirm its potential to serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool. Further research and real-world application are warranted to explore the device's broader impact on dermatological practice and patient care.

Summary​

  • Code: LEGIT_COVIDX_EVCDAO_2022
  • Status: Finished
  • Start date: March 3rd, 2022
  • Finish date: October 23rd, 2023
  • Acceptance criteria:
    • A score of 8 or higher in the Clinical Utility Score (CUS) filled by the medical staff

Automatic SCOring of Atopic Dermatitis Using Deep Learning: A Pilot Study

· 2 min de lectura
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Peer-reviewed journal

Our ASCORAD (Automatic SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis) study, a collaboration with Dr. Ramon Grimalt, was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (JID) Innovations. This study details our approach to automating severity assessment of atopic dermatitis and eczema.

Medela, A., Mac Carthy, T., Aguilar Robles, S. A., Chiesa-Estomba, C. M., & Grimalt, R. (2022). Automatic SCOring of Atopic Dermatitis Using Deep Learning: A Pilot Study. In JID Innovations (Vol. 2, Issue 3, p. 100107). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100107